| December
2005 |
|||||
|
|||||
|
2. 2005
eligible Registered Retirement Savings Plan (RRSP) contribution
amounts are noted on the 2004 personal income tax return
assessment notices. You have until March
1st, 2006 to make tax deductible RRSP contributions for
the 2005 year. 3. Persons turning 69 in 2005 must mature their RRSP into cash, an annuity or a Registered Retirement Income Fund by December 31st, 2005. 4. If you own a business, consider paying a reasonable salary to family members for their services rendered to the business. 5. Consider purchasing
assets eligible for capital cost allowance
before the year end. For example, employees
may claim capital cost allowance on automobiles
used in their employment. – Must have a T2200. 7. If income in an inter vivos trust is to be taxed on a beneficiary’s return, the income must be paid or payable to the beneficiary by December 31, 2005. 8. Health
and dental premiums for the self-employed
In a July 29th, 2005 Tax Court of Canada case, the taxpayer purchased “over-the-counter” medications, as advised by his doctor, with respect to throat cancer. These expenditures were denied as a medical expense because they were not “recorded by a pharmacist”. The Court noted that there are laws throughout Canada that describe the records that a pharmacist is required to keep. Medications purchased off the shelf do not meet these requirements. ADOPTION EXPENSE TAX CREDIT The Income Tax Act now provides a tax credit for eligible adoption expenses to a maximum of $10,000 during the adoption period. An eligible child means a child under age eighteen at the time the Adoption Order is issued. DISABILITY TAX CREDIT In a July 7th, 2005 Tax Court of Canada case, the Court permitted a Disability Tax Credit for a taxpayer with a number of health problems including:
The Court noted
that the Disability Tax Credit is also available to a person who has
a cumulative disability creating a severe
and prolonged impairment. The rules affecting
incorporation of professional practices have recently been relaxed.
However, incorporating a professional practice may not be economically
beneficial to all professionals as the anticipated tax savings may be
minimal and outweighed by extra expenses and higher exposure to audit
risk. If applicable, please contact our office to evaluate your particular
situation. In an August 5th, 2005 Tax Court of Canada case, an investment advisor’s claim with respect to employment expenses for compensation to a client who lost money, workspace in the home, office equipment, and transportation was dealt with as follows: The Court disallowed the amount of the claim paid to unhappy clients because the advisor did not have formal recordkeeping as to the payments. The Court accepted Canada Revenue Agency’s reassessment that only 8% of the home was used for the home office, rather than the 25% claimed by the taxpayer because the taxpayer did not prove the 25%. Canada Revenue Agency permitted only partial claims for the equipment leasing payments made to the advisor’s spouse’s company due to a lack of documentation. Also, the claim for transportation expenses was disallowed because of a lack of documentation. MORAL: Documentation
is important! Please note that an “automobile log” is required
in order to substantiate the claim for the business travel. In general, an individual must hold shares for two years to obtain the $500,000 enhanced capital gain exemption on the sale of the shares of an active private corporation. However, the Income Tax Act permits an individual to transfer all, or substantially all, of the assets used in a proprietorship to a corporation and then sell the shares immediately and still get the capital gain exemption. In a March 21st,
2005 External Technical Interpretation, Canada
Revenue Agency noted that this is also available to an individual who
sells all, or part, of a partnership interest
to a corporation. The normal procedure when a Canadian-controlled private corporation has active business income in excess of $300,000 is to declare a bonus to the owner-managers such that the corporate active business income is reduced to, say, $300,000 and the bonus is taxed as employment income to the owner-managers. Alternatively, the corporation may bonus down to the provincial small business deduction amount which is $400,000 in some provinces. An alternative to the “bonus” is to pay that amount to a pension vehicle – an RCA. The payment is subject to a 50% refundable tax to the government. When funds are distributed (taken out by the employee) from the RCA, the 50% tax penalty withheld is refunded and the amounts are taxable to the individual. The advantage is that the corporation may use the assets of the RCA and the refundable tax as collateral to obtain a bank loan thereby increasing the capital available to the company. The RCA may make sense to owner-managers that already have personal income taxed at top rates. Caution:
This is complicated, requires special
professional advice, and is not for
everybody. Also, an Ontario
taxpayer has appealed an Ontario Court of
Appeals decision to the Supreme Court of Canada
where his former wife successfully applied
to reinstate her spousal support payment that was terminated by the
Manitoba Courts in 1992. The taxpayer faces the prospect of paying hundreds
of thousands of dollars of retroactive support. In a July 12th,
2005 Canada Revenue Agency Release,
Canada Revenue Agency notes that their position in respect of the deductibility
to the payor and income inclusion to the recipient
of a lump-sum retroactive support payment is set out in Paragraphs 21
and 22 of their Interpretation Bulletin IT-530R
which is available on the CANADA REVENUE AGENCY website (www.cra-arc.gc.ca). Taxpayers age 65
or over who have higher income on their personal tax returns
are subject to a clawback of the Old
Age Security. For example, the clawback rate in 2005 is
15% of the excess when the person’s income reaches $60,806. The
clawback is based on individual income. Therefore,
if each spouse has, say, $55,000 of income there will be no
clawback. In addition, there are clawbacks of the GST credit and other low income entitlements. Consider this: If a taxpayer dies and leaves assets to a spouse, it may be advantageous if those amounts were left in trust so that the income is on a Trust Return and, not on the personal tax return of the beneficiary. Another option is to have a corporation, not the individual, earn income such as business income. RECEIVING CANADA PENSION PLAN (CPP) EARLY If a person qualifies, and take CPP early (for example, at age 60), rather than age 65, the CPP is reduced by 0.5% a month for each month under the age of 65. Therefore, the CPP received at 60 would be 30% lower than the age 65 amount. If the individual
has a private pension plan which will be reduced
by CPP received at age 65, it may make sense
to start receiving CPP at age 60.
For the first $2,000 contributed to an RESP in a year for a child, the federal government will contribute 20%, or $400, as a Canada Education Savings Grant (CESG) (to a total maximum of $7,200 per child). The money contributed to the RESP grows on a tax-deferred basis although the initial contribution is not tax deductible. The investment income is taxed to the student when withdrawn for educational purposes. The RESP investments are the same as for RRSPs. A Family RESP Plan may be established so that the funds could be used by any of the children. Also, a RESP may be established such that if the child does not attend a post-secondary institution, the funds may be rolled into the contributor’s RRSP, assuming the contributor has contribution room. If contribution room is not available, the contributor may withdraw the funds but is subject to a 20% penalty tax. In both cases, the CESG must be paid back. Other ways to provide
funds for a child’s education include
Trusts where one parent contributes
the funds and the other parent acts as the
Trustee. However, these Plans miss out on
the CESG. A Reverse Mortgage permits an elderly person to borrow a percentage of the equity in their homes. The money borrowed plus interest does not have to be repaid until the homeowner sells the home, moves, or dies. Since 1986, these mortgages have largely been provided by a company called Canadian Home Income Plan Corp. (CHIP). The Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) website warns that Reverse Mortgages can be expensive because of high fees and higher interest rates and will deplete the equity in the home. The proceeds are tax-free as they represent loans. Therefore, they will not affect income-related plans available to seniors such as the Guaranteed Income Supplement, Old Age Security, the age credit, and GST credits.
(top
of the page) |
|||||
copyright
© 2007 - 2008 - Baratz Judelman Chartered Accountants All rights reserved Web Master : simoncmchan@yahoo.com Last updated: December 2007 |